What is a primary disadvantage of using hose in hydraulic systems compared to piping or tubing?

Using hose in hydraulic systems is less permanent compared to piping or tubing due to its structure and materials. Hoses are typically made from flexible rubber or thermoplastic materials that are designed to withstand pressure and allow for movement. However, this flexibility comes at the cost of durability and permanence, compared to rigid piping or tubing, which are more stable and can be secured in fixed positions.

In situations where a hydraulic system requires a permanent installation, piping and tubing are preferred because they provide a more robust and lasting solution. Hoses, while easier to install and route in tight spaces due to their flexibility, are often used in applications where the system might need to be adjusted or moved. The temporary nature of hose installations can lead to more frequent replacements or repairs, emphasizing its disadvantage in terms of long-term usage in stationary systems.